| Disclaimer | ii | 
		
			| Abstract | iii | 
		
			| Table of Contents | v | 
		
			| List of Figures | vii | 
		
			| List of Tables | ix | 
		
			| Executive Summary | x | 
		
			| 1 | INTRODUCTION | 1 | 
		
			|  | 1.1 | High Temperature Gas Desulfurization | 1 | 
		
			| 1.2 | Ceria-Zirconia Catalyst Research | 3 | 
		
			| 1.3 | Objectives of the Research | 3 | 
		
			| 2 | ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF 
			CeO2-ZrO2 | 4 | 
		
			|  | 2.1 | Electrochemical Experimental | 4 | 
		
			| 2.2 | Solid State Analyses | 5 | 
		
			| 2.3 | Electrosynthesis Results and Discussion | 6 | 
		
			|   | 2.3.1 | Composition | 6 | 
		
			| 2.3.2 | XRD and TEM Characterization | 6 | 
		
			| 2.3.3 | Electrochemical Process Characterization | 12 | 
		
			| 3 | REACTION AND SORBENT CHARACTERIZATION EQUIPMENT | 16 | 
		
			|  | 3.1 | Fixed-Bed Reactor | 16 | 
		
			| 3.2 | Gas Analysis | 18 | 
		
			| 3.3 | Electrobalance Reactor | 21 | 
		
			| 3.4 | BET Surface Area | 24 | 
		
			| 3.5 | X-Ray Diffraction | 24 | 
		
			| 4 | SORBENT MATERIALS | 24 | 
		
			|  | 4.1 | Commercial Sorbents | 25 | 
		
			| 4.2 | Sorbents Synthesized at LSU | 25 | 
		
			| 4.3 | Sorbent Nomenclature | 26 | 
		
			| 5 | SORBENT CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS | 26 | 
		
			|  | 5.1 | X-Ray Diffraction Spectra | 26 | 
		
			| 5.2 | BET Surface Area and Crystallite Size | 28 | 
		
			| 5.3 | Sorbent Reduction | 29 | 
		
			| 6 | FIXED-BED DESULFURIZATION RESULTS | 33 | 
		
			|  | 6.1 | Reaction Conditions and Dimensionless Time | 33 | 
		
			| 6.2 | Typical Reactor Response Curves | 36 | 
		
			| 6.3 | Commercial Ceria Sorbents | 38 | 
		
			|  | 6.3.1 | Ce(RP) vs Ce(Alfa) | 38 | 
		
			| 6.3.2 | The Effect of Temperature on Ce(RP) | 40 | 
		
			| 6.3.3 | Pre-reduction of Ce(RP) | 40 | 
		
			| 6.3.4 | The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 42 | 
		
			| 6.4 | Commercial Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 43 | 
		
			|   | 6.4.1 | Comparison of CZ(Nex) and Ce(RP) | 43 | 
		
			| 6.4.2 | Pre-reduction of CZ(Nex) 85 | 44 | 
		
			| 6.3.5 | The Effect of CO2 on sulfidation of 
			CZ(Nex) 70 | 45 | 
		
			| 6.5 | LSU Ceria and Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 45 | 
		
			|  | 6.5.1 | Defining Reference Time for Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 46 | 
		
			| 6.5.2 | The Effect of Sulfidation Temperature | 47 | 
		
			| 6.5.3 | The Effect of Pre-reduction | 49 | 
		
			| 6.5.4 | The Effect of CO2 Addition | 51 | 
		
			| 7 | SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | 55 | 
		
			| 8 | REFERENCES | 56 | 
		
			|  | 
		
			| LIST OF FIGURES | 
		
			| Figure 1 | Electrochemical Cell Schematic | 5 | 
		
			| Figure 2 | Electrolyte Concentration vs. Final Powder 
			Composition | 7 | 
		
			| Figure 3 | TEM Images of (a) Ceria, (b) Ceria-7 mol% Zirconia 
			(c) Ceria-18 mol% Zirconia | 8 | 
		
			| Figure 4 | Selected-Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) Pattern 
			Taken Over a Large Area Shown in Figure 3 | 9 | 
		
			| Figure 5 | XRD Analysis of (a) Electrochemically Generated 
			Nanocrystalline Ceo(0.82)Zr(0.18)O2. (b) Cubic CeO2 
			(JCPDS 34-394), and (c) Monoclinic (JCPDS 37-1484) and Tetragonal (JCPDS 
			42-1164) ZrO2 | 10 | 
		
			| Figure 6 | XRD Patterns for Three Different Cel-xZrxO2 
			Samples, where x Represents the Mol Fraction of Zirconia | 11 | 
		
			| Figure 7 | A Comparison Between the LSU and Commercial NexTech 
			XRD Powder Patterns | 11 | 
		
			| Figure 8 | Heat Treated 700oC, 
			18.7 mol % Zr Ceria-Zirconia with Resulting Crystallite Size of (a) 
			9.5 nm, (b) 10 nm, (c) 11 nm, (d) 12 nm, (e) 12.5 nm, (f) 12.5 nm, 
			and (g) 14.5 nm | 12 | 
		
			| Figure 9 | TEM Micrograph of 18.7% mol ZrO2 After 
			106 hrs of Heat Treatment at 700oC | 13 | 
		
			| Figure 10 | Heat Treated 700oC, 
			65.2% mol Zr, Ceria-Zirconia with Resulting Crystallite Size of (a) 
			4 nm, (b) 5 nm, (c) 6 nm, (d,e) 7 nm, and (g) 8nm. Heat Treated 
			Times Shown at Right | 13 | 
		
			| Figure 11 | TEM Micrograph of 65.2% at Zr After 106 hr of Heat 
			Treatment at 700oC | 14 | 
		
			| Figure 12 | Current Characteristics for the Ce and Ce-Zr 
			Electrolyte at an Applied Potential of - 2.0 V and Stagnant Solution | 15 | 
		
			| Figure 13 | Current Characteristics of Ceria-Zirconia in 
			Quiescent Solution and With a Stirring speed of 900 rpm at an 
			Applied Potential of -2.0 V | 15 | 
		
			| Figure 14 | Polarization Curves Corrected for Ohmic Drop, 
			Solution C for a Scan Rate of 5mV/s | 16 | 
		
			| Figure 15 | Fixed-Bed Reactor System | 17 | 
		
			| Figure 16 | Details of the Quartz Reactor | 18 | 
		
			| Figure 17 | Chromatograph Sampling Arrangement | 20 | 
		
			| Figure 18 | PFPD Calibration Curve | 22 | 
		
			| Figure 19 | PFPD Chromatogram at 0.1 ppmv H2S | 22 | 
		
			| Figure 20 | TCD Calibration Curve | 23 | 
		
			| Figure 21 | Electrobalance Reactor System | 23 | 
		
			| Figure 22 | XRD Spectra of (a) LSU CeO2 (b) cubic CeO2 
			(JCPDS 34-394) | 27 | 
		
			| Figure 23 | XRD Spectra of (a) CZ(Nex) 85, (b) Tetragonal ZrO2 
			(JCPDS 88-1007) | 27 | 
		
			| Figure 24 | XRD Spectra of (a) Ce(LSU), (b) CZ(LSU)90, and (c) 
			CZ(LSU)80 | 28 | 
		
			| Figure 25 | Weight Loss Associated with Heating in an Inert 
			Atmosphere | 30 | 
		
			| Figure 26 | Reduction of Ce(RP) in Three Reducing Gas 
			Compositions | 31 | 
		
			| Figure 27 | Comparison of Reducibility of Ce(RP) and CZ(Nex) 80 
			in Gas 2 | 32 | 
		
			| Figure 28 | Reducibility of Ce(LSU), CZ(LSU) 90 and CZ(LSU) 80 
			in Gas 3 | 32 | 
		
			| Figure 29 | Typical Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves and Sorbent 
			Conversions (Full Concentration Scale) | 37 | 
		
			| Figure 30 | Typical Sulfidation Prebreakthrough Curves (Expanded 
			Concentration Scale) | 37 | 
		
			| Figure 31 | Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves of Pure CeO2 
			Sorbents (Full Concentration Scale) | 39 | 
		
			| Figure 32 | Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves of Pure CeO2 
			Sorbents (Expanded Concentration Scale) | 39 | 
		
			| Figure 33 | Temperature Effect on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 41 | 
		
			| Figure 34 | The Effect of Pre-reduction on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 41 | 
		
			| Figure 35 | The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 42 | 
		
			| Figure 36 | Comparison of the Sulfidation of Ce(RP) and CZ(Nex) | 44 | 
		
			| Figure 37 | The Effect of Pre-reduction on Sulfidation of CZ(Nex) 
			85 | 45 | 
		
			| Figure 38 | The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(Nex) 70 | 46 | 
		
			| Figure 39 | Complete Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves Using LSU 
			Sorbents | 48 | 
		
			| Figure 40 | The Effect of Temperature on Sulfidation of Ce(LSU) | 48 | 
		
			| Figure 41 | The Effect of Temperature on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(LSU)80 | 49 | 
		
			| Figure 42 | Comparison of the Sulfidation Performance of Ce(LSU), 
			CZ(LSU)90, and CZ(LSU)80 | 50 | 
		
			| Figure 43 | The Effect of Prereduction on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(LSU)90 | 50 | 
		
			| Figure 44 | The Effect of CO2 Addition Using Ce(LSU) 
			(Full Concentration Scale) | 52 | 
		
			| Figure 45 | The Effect of CO2 Addition Using Ce(LSU) 
			(Expanded Concentration Scale) | 52 | 
		
			| Figure 46 | The Effect of CO2 Addition Using 
			CZ(LSU)80 (Full Concentration Scale) | 53 | 
		
			| Figure 47 | The Effect of CO2 Addition Using 
			CZ(LSU)80 (Expanded Concentration Scale) | 53 | 
		
			|  | 
		
			| LIST OF TABLES | 
		
			| Table 1 | Composition of the Various Electrolyte Solutions (M) | 5 | 
		
			| Table 2 | Resistivity of Solution C at Various Times of 
			Deposition | 14 | 
		
			| Table 3 | Gas Chromatograph Operating Conditions | 19 | 
		
			| Table 4 | Average Crystallite Sizes and BET Surface Areas of 
			Test Sorbents | 29 | 
		
			| Table 5 | Summary of Reduction Results for Eight Test Sorbents | 34 | 
		
			| Table 6 | Calculation of the Reference Times for Sulfidation 
			Reactions | 36 | 
		
			| Table 7 | Reference Times for Two Sulfidation Stoichiometries | 47 | 
		
			| Table 8 | Summary of Sulfidation Test Results at 700oC 
			Using LSU Sorbents and Varying CO2 Feed Gas 
			Concentrations | 54 |